Bluelight

Thread: GHB/1,4-B/GBL Discussion and use- Part II

Page 3 of 17 FirstFirst 123456713 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 419
  1. Collapse Details
     
    #51
    Bluelighter mushi mushi 88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Through the rabbit hole!
    Posts
    1,960
    Quote Originally Posted by Jakeperson View Post
    I have tried with 4-MMC with no ill effects.
    Slightly different.

    Did you end up trying?

    No I did not.

    I ate some M1 the night before hand but I had already consumed a lot of alcohol along with 4 pills so I didn't really feel its effects... I'm prob going to do some M1 sometime tomorrow by itself I'm thinking but not with frank so that experience will belong in the 4-MMC thread I'm guessing seeing as nobody has made an M1 thread yet...
    Reply With Quote
     

  2. Collapse Details
     
    #52
    Bluelighter
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Melbourne, VIC, Australia
    Posts
    2,036
    Mushi: M1 doesn't seem to be so widely available here in AU. I've tried a few doses of M1 once, it was quite grande. i started with a 300mg oral dose, and topped it up with 100mg nasally.

    Was quite nice.

    anyway, why is this thread talkin bout cathinones?
    Reply With Quote
     

  3. Collapse Details
     
    #53
    Bluelighter
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Permanent ++
    Posts
    3,643
    Discussing the combination between GHB and his friends and the cathinones.

    According to europeans it is quite easy to blow out on G after Drone, however I barely felt any affects off of 2ml, but was quite good later in bed with another .5ml.
    Reply With Quote
     

  4. Collapse Details
     
    #54
    Bluelight Crew PsiloSubNaut's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Professor Nutbutter's house of treats
    Posts
    2,849
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimity View Post
    Ladies and gentlemen, it has finally happened.

    Scientists have invented magic.

    An E.Coli strain that eats sugar and shits 1,4-b.

    Thats right. We can now grow G.

    Excuse me while I go clean myself up.
    Interesting

    If only more complex drugs could be made so easily

    Wait till the Melbourne hardstylers get wind of this one lol
    Reply With Quote
     

  5. Collapse Details
     
    #55
    Bluelight Crew PsiloSubNaut's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Professor Nutbutter's house of treats
    Posts
    2,849
    Synthesis

    In its industrial synthesis, acetylene reacts with two equivalents of formaldehyde to form 1,4-butynediol, also known as but-2-yne-1,4-diol. This type of process is illustrative of what is known as Reppe Chemistry. Hydrogenation of 1,4-butynediol gives 1,4-butanediol.

    It can also be manufactured on an industrial scale by the vapour phase hydrogenation of the esters and anhydrides of maleic acid and succinic acid.

    Genomatica (a San Diego-based company) has genetically engineered E. coli to devour sugar and construct 1,4-butanediol. They expect to build and begin operating a pilot plant by the end of 2009. CEO Christopher Gann said it takes 32,000 BTU/per pound to make. This is much less than the process listed above, and does not have any by-products.[1] [2]
    Simpler to make and no by products.
    Reply With Quote
     

  6. Collapse Details
     
    #56
    What's the legal status of GBL in Oz? They're banning it in the UK end of the year and I'm thinking of ordering some before that happens(living in Oz now).
    Reply With Quote
     

  7. Collapse Details
     
    #57
    Bluelighter Sustanon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Wonderland
    Posts
    4,546
    Quote Originally Posted by Tylerdurden View Post
    What's the legal status of GBL in Oz? They're banning it in the UK end of the year and I'm thinking of ordering some before that happens(living in Oz now).
    Very much illegal in OZ mate. Still legal in some parts of EU where i lived. Actually have a few liters sitting on a shelf at home back in EU. Never liked the feeling it gave me, just felt drunk. Cant believe how people manage to drink that crap. Makes me puke just when i smelt it. Prob gonna use it up to clean some stains with it lol

    No one in the country i lived in did any. Its very unpopular in Eastern part of EU. Prob as rare as ice.
    Reply With Quote
     

  8. Collapse Details
     
    #58
    Bluelighter Smoifer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Burn City, VIC
    Posts
    335
    Yeah pretty much as sustanon said, quite illegal although you can still get it shipped in from overseas...

    Although I'm a big fan of GBL, GHB &1-4B, too bad it's a bit hard to get hold of round here atm...
    Reply With Quote
     

  9. Collapse Details
     
    #59
    Does anybody know how to tell if you've got close to pure GBL? I know no GBL is pure because even the stuff you get from China is 99.98% pure even though it's close to pure it still isn't lol.

    I've been getting some pretty sick GBL for a while now where 2mL gets the room spinning like crazy but sometimes when I buy stuff from other sources I need to take 3mL to get near similar effects so I'm wondering if anybody knows of a simple way to tell... Its been pretty dry for it lately and I just got onto some the other day, (from my usual trustworthy source), he told me to take only half of what I usually do because it's extremely pure I just want a way to test it cause their is nothing worse then the taste of the shit and I hate re-dosing it....!

    Thanks in advance guys.
    Reply With Quote
     

  10. Collapse Details
     
    #60
    Bluelighter
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Melbourne, VIC, Australia
    Posts
    2,036
    99.98% is pure... have a look at an assay and see what the .02% is...
    Reply With Quote
     

  11. Collapse Details
     
    #61
    Bluelighter Sustanon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Wonderland
    Posts
    4,546
    the 0.2% is water. The GBL that comes from most labs cant be more pure. With chemicals its the same, as soon as u open it the 100% becomes 99.8%.
    Reply With Quote
     

  12. Collapse Details
     
    #62
    Bluelight Crew phase_dancer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    6,158
    With chemicals its the same, as soon as u open it the 100% becomes 99.8%.
    Only chemicals that are either hygroscopic or deliquescent. Many things aren't.
    Reply With Quote
     

  13. Collapse Details
     
    #63
    Bluelighter Sustanon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Wonderland
    Posts
    4,546
    Quote Originally Posted by phase_dancer View Post
    Only chemicals that are either hygroscopic or deliquescent. Many things aren't.
    Most common chemicals are.
    Reply With Quote
     

  14. Collapse Details
     
    #64
    Don't be too specific now.
    Reply With Quote
     

  15. Collapse Details
     
    #65
    Can anybody out their answer my question?
    Reply With Quote
     

  16. Collapse Details
     
    #66
    Bluelighter Sustanon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Wonderland
    Posts
    4,546
    Quote Originally Posted by smiggle View Post
    Can anybody out their answer my question?
    U need a lab setup to analyze its purity.
    Reply With Quote
     

  17. Collapse Details
     
    #67
    Bluelighter
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Melbourne, VIC, Australia
    Posts
    2,036
    we did answer your question - READ THE ASSAY SHEET ON GBL 99%+
    Reply With Quote
     

  18. Collapse Details
     
    #68
    Bluelight Crew phase_dancer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    6,158
    Most common chemicals are.
    Another broad and incorrect statement. Fats, oils, waxes, alkanes, many plastics, non ionic surfactants, most amino acids such as alanine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, phenylalanine, and methionine; silicones, proteins....etc etc. all hydrophobic i.e. not hygroscopic

    As for drugs there are many hydrophobic drugs, including glucocorticoids and cyclosporine and most lipophillic drugs aren't hygroscopic including benzodiazepines; Diazepam, Lorazepam Temazepam, Oxazepam, etc, Haloperidol, Benzthiazide, Chlorpromazine, Eptastigmine, Indomethacine, Oxyphenbutazone, Pyrimethamine, Methoxsalen, Methylprednisone etc.... and many sulphur containing drugs.
    Reply With Quote
     

  19. Collapse Details
     
    #69
    Bluelight Crew phase_dancer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    6,158
    I don't know whether 99+% would be easily read using a hydrometer, but specific gravity can be used to measure concentration. No lab required.
    Reply With Quote
     

  20. Collapse Details
     
    #70
    Any thing over one dose? thats harsh.
    Reply With Quote
     

  21. Collapse Details
     
    #71
    Quote Originally Posted by MrIbis View Post
    we did answer your question - READ THE ASSAY SHEET ON GBL 99%+
    Can somebody link me to this essay please.....
    Reply With Quote
     

  22. Collapse Details
     
    #72
    Bluelighter
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Melbourne, VIC, Australia
    Posts
    2,036
    If you have a source for GBL, you should be able to find an Assay (not essay).

    Due to the fact i'd be linking to a source - i cant link you to it, just google it. Also the information might be found on some MSDS (Material Safety Data Sheet(s)).
    Reply With Quote
     

  23. Collapse Details
     
    #73
    OK thank you for your help guys.

    Much appreciated
    Reply With Quote
     

  24. Collapse Details
     
    #74
    Bluelight Crew Samadhi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    The Hourglass Nebula
    Posts
    12,925
    Quote Originally Posted by belarki View Post
    ^^ what about charlie and harry?

    But yeh, frank is new to me. Damn you young'uns with your new fandangled language mushi
    Frank has been a slang term for GHB/1,4b & GBL dating back almost a decade! (well, that's when i heard it used - around 2000). I'm originally from Brisbane, and that was a pretty common slang term for it. Not so much in Melbourne, that i've heard.

    You're right though - every drug has a nickname which is fine, except it's best to keep that kind of thing out of serious discussion threads as it can just get confusing to people.
    Reply With Quote
     

  25. Collapse Details
     
    #75
    has anyone heard this stuff being called 'juice' ?
    Reply With Quote
     

Page 3 of 17 FirstFirst 123456713 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •