Psychedelic Effects Profile Survey Link - Please take this survey and read the instructions carefully, for as many substances you've taken as you can!
I think I brought up the idea of tackling ID requests a while ago and it was buried, so in the light of continued ID requests i thought I'd put it out on the forum again in a different form. The prompt was an ID thread closed tonight amid friendly banter between Xorkoth and Willow 11 (who I think do a great job BTW).
The rule of no drug ID's and the standard response of "cannot know" might be smothering the opportunity to build up a thread which aims to construct "effects profiles" or "unique signatures" of each substance.
Xorkoth - you write
in response to Ghettochrist's questionNo way at all of knowing through the Internet. You'll need GC/MS analysis done on it to be sure
so alot of these rarer psychedellics, the effects can be all pretty similar in alot of cases?
..... and then follow it with
That really hasn't been my experience. I find all the different types of psychedelics to be quite unique, although of course they share some similarities. ......................... and I can't see how you could confuse them unless you'd only ever done a couple of different psychedelics.
It is your comments about their "uniqueness" and "difficulty in confusing them" that makes me wonder if the rules could be softened to allow postings which contained good descriptions of the effects in order that, at some point, profiles could be constructed which would allow readers to make their own, "reasonably informed" guesses. IMO bioassays are gaining credence, although they are anathema to the hard-line scientists.
Any views from other BL's?
Or would this be beyond the pale?
Last edited by a moderator: