I am not implying that the guidelines would only be for you.
Obviously. You didn’t think I thought you were implying that, did you?
I am talking about the whole thread. Over the last six years, I have frequently seen the thread slide into pointless back and forth between people that detracts from the primary objectives of the thread and distracts from the purpose. In my opinion, things like name calling have no place here. Telling people to fuck off has no place here. I see no reason why the thread cannot be one of professionalism and respect from everyone.
Wait, what? Who said “fuck off”? I missed that part. What’re you talking about? I can’t find that utterance in this conversation when I search for it. And I don’t
think or
seem to recall any significant name-calling either. But to your point, I’m letting ego get in the way. I don’t need to do this, what should I care?
I can tell that you are taking these comments personally and feeling attacked.
Well the comments being thrown at me are in fact personal and not of a friendly nature let’s just say. But if everyone else says I’m being a dick, I guess I’m being a dick.
I appreciate your sympathy, but I assure you I’m not as upset as you seem to think I am. Just mildly frustrated and disappointed. Guess I should check my expectations.
My intent is not to attack anyone.
Uh oh, this should be good… I get the feeling you’re about to lay all of the blame on me for this current petty squabble, even though I think it’s pretty obvious who’s trying to antagonize whom. Just look for the ALLCAPS statements. I’m not the one flipping out…
But, like you, I am not going to back down from stating my thoughts simply because someone else in a forum has a different viewpoint.
And yet… is this not what you’re buttering me up to do? “Back down from stating my thoughts because someone else in a forum has a different viewpoint”?
I did not see anything wrong with the original post from
@moonyham. He shared a personal opinion based on a personal experience.
No? Not seeing any flawed logic? People can have opinions and anecdotes, and you’re right, they stated an opinion. And I happen to have an opinion of that opinion, and I’m just sharing my observations as well.
"who might aswell just be afflicted by permatolerance or aging brains."
Na man, I made a post here a while ago about my gf, a virgin to mdma, only smoked weed twice in her life. She had a meh experience, as did I. Our pupils didn't fully dilate and she fell asleep 2-3hrs after consumption, something that should not be possible on real mdma. It tested positive for mdma on a regent test.
As I and others have pointed out, there’s so much flawed logic here it’s astounding.
I didn't even know about mehdma when I took it, after around a 10 year break from party drugs. So I didn't go into it and psyche myself out or something.
Everything about my experience lines up with others though, which to me, given I didn't know shit about the topic, says that it isn't a brain aging situation or perma tolerance. It's the drug. They've fucked with it.
See I guess it’s that last line that gets to me. “They’re fucked with it.” Have you ever dealt with somebody going through drug-induced psychosis, like someone who it turns out doesn’t handle stimulants so well and begins seeing the ITF (Invisible Task Force) everywhere? I have had some nightmarish experiences involving hours of trying to help someone through a schizotypal personality disorder episode. I’ve seen it get ugly too. “They’ve fucked with it” and the bold confidence with which this is proclaimed reminds me of these times … But you’re right: what right have I to come down on someone for holding an opinion, no matter what I think of its inner logic?
I felt like your response came down hard and shut him down.
I guess you’re right.
@moonyham I owe you an apology. I’m sorry; I hope you accept my sincere apology. I overreacted and set off a chain of events for which I will take the blame.
Instead of being defensive about that, if you genuinely have any respect for me in this thread, maybe just pause for a second and try to hear what is being said.
Done and done. Thank you for the mediation, kind words, and levelheadedness (I’m 95% sure that’s a word).
I too have asked the same thing, btw, that others actually read what I’m posting instead of putting words in my mouth, and then think about what I’ve written.
All I said was that tone can come across differently from intent, and sometimes the tone of your posts seems to shut people down, (or triggers a debate that may not have otherwise occurred). Do with that information what you will, or do nothing.
You know, I’ve seen you get irked on this thread in the past when people would continuously post the wrong data and you’d be chiding them and insisting that the discussion is meant to reduced its scope to those MDMA samples that had already been sent in to IEC or similar for testing and had come back as containing nothing but MDMA. I’ve seen it throughout this post, people reminding others of how they need to read the thread before they wind up posting the same goddamn flawed arguments over and over. I guess I lost my patience for a moment there and let it come out in the form of sarcasm; my guess is the “tone conveyed” was set when I sarcastically /rhetorically asked if they knew that this opinion didn’t prove anything before pointing out the logic fallacy that’s been around since at least the times of the ancient Greeks.
But I believe the overall quality of the thread would improve if EVERYONE could refrain from name calling and personal attacks. Share links. Share experiences. Share opinions. We are all here for similar reasons. Keep the conversation moving forward.
I guess I get caught up in seeking the truth and I sometimes forget to consider the emotional states of others, maybe or probably or something on account of me being a bit “spectrum-y” if you will. I don’t carry malice in my heart though, and I do care about the feelings of others. You know, I’m just a kind of person who is better at things like mathematics, playing the piano, writing code, and creating meaningful visualizations for people from data objects… better at that than I am guessing how tone conveyance might be lost on an Internet forum.
Apologies if I am coming across in an accusatory fashion. Part of my real life profession involves linguistics and the analysis of tone in writing, so it is hard to not notice these pointless waves of conflict as they ripple through the thread.
That’s funny, bc I’m a little obsessed with linguistics, personally. Like I can seriously nerd out on some Noam Chomsky and I can endlessly rattle off etymologies I find fascinating. Many years ago I had a full academic scholarship to an arts school on the U.S. east coast. Despite being given advice not to do so, I stupidly majored in Music Composition before becoming disillusioned to the formal academic study of music (though it was fun to study jazz, having been trained classically from the time I was 6), and I changed my major to business administration and then again to a dual major in computer science and biochemistry (so I had something absurd like ~162 credit hours by the time I graduated). I don’t remember my point now… oh yeah, I often wonder what would’ve happened if I majored in linguistics instead, but someone told me I couldn’t do anything with a linguistics degree but teach, and thus stuck with me, however, at the time I saw no reason not to major in music comp despite it being an even worse choice for a major than linguistics…
I’m rambling. This has been tiring and the ALD-52 is worn off from my system. Crashing imminently. Peace, love, unity, and respect to all you guys. Sorry I’m a dick and a sperglord. One love.